
You will not find that in the brochures or under technical information on the websites. And the figures you may see do not necessarily have to be real for Norwegian conditions.
I have been on a long trip with the Audi A3 e-tron, the sister model of the Volkswagen Golf GTE. If you want to know how much petrol these cars use in reality, you have to check what owners and car journalists report. Actually, there are only two things that are interesting: - How far the batteries go, and what the fuel consumption is when the battery range is 0 km.
The batteries last approximately 30-35 kilometers - no more, no less. Many people can then drive to and from work on electricity, provided they have charging options at home and/or at work. Without charging options, you lose one of the charging hybrid's biggest advantages.
On long-distance driving, it matters little how much you have left in the batteries. I prefer to put the car in "Hybrid" mode right away and let the car distribute the battery energy itself while driving, instead of running the car out of power and then letting it switch to "Hybrid" by itself. It may just be imagination, but I think hybrid operation works better when the batteries are not run completely empty.

0,42 litres/mile
Road driving 80 zone with 80-100 km/h on the speedometer.
Measured distance: 88 km (Outhuskrysset to Tretten).
Battery range: 3 to 0 km
Outside temperature: Between -1,5 and -5,0 degrees
Inside temperature: 18,5 degrees.
0,53 litres/mile
Motorway with 100-120 km/h on the speedometer.
Measured distance: 114 km (Kolomoen to Lysaker).
Battery range: 0 km
Outside temperature: Between -1,5 and -5,0 degrees
Inside temperature: 19,0 degrees
Normal for the class
The factory figures for another powerful Audi A3, – 2,0 TFSI 190 HP – are 0,47 on the highway and 0,71 in the city. You must pay full taxes on that car. Owners of the A3 e-tron are exempt from the one-off fee. They get a 1,4 TFSI 150 HP assisted by a 54 horsepower electric motor. Both cars are ideal for long journeys and have roughly the same fuel consumption.
I think this is typical for plug-in hybrids. If you drive a hybrid, you get a fuel consumption that can certainly claim to be among the best in the class, but which certainly does not revolutionize anything.
The total consumption of the e-tron includes both petrol and electricity. The electric power is built up during the trip, among other things by transferring braking energy to the batteries. If you put the gear lever in "S", you get an artificial engine brake that is so powerful that you can both accelerate and brake with the same pedal, as in BMW i3. Without doing any scientific work, I think the engine brake charges the batteries very efficiently while driving and increases the range. But be aware that the engine brake also turns on the brake lights. With a bit of snow on the rear window, I could follow when the brake lights came on. If you are not very firm on the gas pedal during deceleration, the brake lights can turn on and off several times, confusing those driving behind. I therefore prefer to use the engine brake only on the longest downhills and as a "retarder" for smooth braking on roundabouts and exits.
Rolls for free
The ordinary engine brake on the e-tron feels almost absent, - almost like a freewheel when you let off the gas. When the car is rolling, the petrol engine is also cut off. As long as you only give a little gas, the car uses the electric motor. With your eyes fixed far ahead on the road, it is possible to drive very economically - and very comfortably without the petrol engine kicking in. It makes me think: - Why don't normal cars have freewheels? Those of us who are old enough to have driven a Saab 96 (-1976) remember the joys of the freewheel.
Driving the A3 e-tron on a lightly trafficked E6 north towards Gudbrandsdalen is pure pleasure. I realize that I could probably have driven even more economically.
Updated measurements
January 2019:
I took the same trip with the same type of car and measured similar results. I started with full batteries. The stretch Lysaker - Tretten in Gudbrandsdalen - a distance of just over 227 km. The average consumption on the entire stretch, measured on the car's trip computer, ended up at 0,49 liters per mile. The trip included the following stages:
113 km motorway (110-130 km/h)
54 km of temporary road due to road works between Kolomoen and Moelv (50-70 km/h)
60 km country road (80 km/h).
On the way home I measured the distance from Tretten to Kolomoen. Then almost completely out of range on the batteries. Before the motorway stretch, consumption ended up at 0,41 liters per mile after having been at 0,40 for a long time. An average speed of just under 70 km/h is ideal for keeping consumption down. The batteries were charged en route and contributed to the low consumption. The range remained between 0 and 1 km depending on the braking. The few times the batteries were absolutely dead, I noticed that the car no longer disengaged the gas engine when I let off the gas to roll. Then the engine braked normally. There is no doubt that hybrid cars run best when there is electricity on the batteries.


Facts
Why given factory figures (EU) are rarely real for hybrid cars
The consumption figures for EU consumption appear according to a norm based on two driving patterns - 1) Urban driving for approx. 13 minutes - approx. 4 km - with an average speed of 18,7 km/h and a top speed of 50 km/h. 2) Road driving for 6 minutes and 40 seconds - approx. 7 km - with an average speed of 62,6 and a top speed of 120 km/h. With a fully charged battery, hybrid cars can achieve very good results in such a test, e.g. almost 0 consumption in the urban driving mode. The problem is that on long journeys consumption will increase significantly because the cars no longer have fully charged batteries. For example, the plug-in hybrid car VW Golf GTE has a stated EU consumption of 1,6 l/100 km. This is only possible with a fully charged battery. The real consumption can therefore be much higher.
See





Audi.no


















