automatic transmission

Who decides the lifespan of the car?

lifespan
Illustration photo: Ebay.com

We who like to look after cars hope that we can keep them on the road for many years. The truth is that we will have no say in the future.

 

The speedometer on our youth car has started cutting out. With the help of the family's youngest driver, I have now ordered a new speedometer on Ebay. Our old Civic of American origin is equipped with one of America's best-selling - and most-screwed - drivetrains. That's why there are probably hundreds of videos on YouTube that show how to fix most things yourself. Also the small circuit board that sits behind the speedometer clock, - the one that no longer works.
 
It's electronics, but not hi-tech. Anyone with a test lamp can troubleshoot. One should really expect that the electronics fails first, and not a mechanical component, - such as the small gear that whirs around in the gearbox and produces data for the speedometer. I think about what would have happened if I had left my laptop from the late 90s in the car. Would it still work today?

Hardly.

 

lifespan
1996 Honda Civic DX

 
A salesman for Audi told me that if you short-circuit the electronics on a modern car, for example by giving jump start assistance, it can cost you around NOK 150. I know a guy who had a Volvo V000 that had problems with the electronics in the automatic gearbox. The entire cash register was replaced with a similarly overhauled cash register. Price tag 70, but fortunately it was only a warranty issue for the owner. I thought: Why didn't they just replace the electronics? The explanation is probably that the electronics are not just about circuit boards, but components built into the case itself.
 
The point here is: What would happen to the V70 today? A 2005 model with a market price of around NOK 100? Would it be worthwhile to fix electronic faults in the gearbox? One thing is certain: no one can do such a job themselves, even with a thousand YouTube videos. I unfortunately think that an otherwise well-functioning V000 would have ended its days as a share car, while old electronics-less 70s are still rolling around on the road.
 
lifespan
2005 Volvo V70

 
The car industry is aware of how vulnerable new cars are to electronic faults. Therefore, a practice seems to have developed to cover electronic faults - and other vulnerable components - even if the warranty period has expired. I know that MøllerBil sends the bills to Germany, - also for pirated imported cars. I have taken advantage of that on several occasions. Toyota has a similar agreement with its factories.
 
But no warranty covers faults with 10-year-old cars.
 
It can therefore be the case that car industry will determine the lifespan of our cars. Imagine that you have delivered your car to a workshop because the yellow engine management light has started to light up, and you are told that the software in your car has unfortunately expired.
 
-We no longer support version 1, and unfortunately your car is not compatible with newer versions...
 
Then I think primarily of the newest generation of electric cars. I've heard that if you're thinking of buying a used Nissan Leaf, by all means make sure you get version 2. Version 1 can't compare to the latest version. It's almost like mobile phones. If you need a new version, you might as well buy a new phone. Volvo advertises that you get your software upgraded for free while your car is being serviced, and they actually call their service "2.0". It is nice. MøllerBil probably charges 2 for it. But if you need a proper upgrade, you may have to change components "all over the place", and then maybe the NOK 000 estimate from the Audi man is not too far from the truth?
 
Hope new cars can be recycled.

2015 Nissan Leaf
2015 Nissan Leaf

 

See

 
Rent or own batteries?

If you buy a NIO, you can choose between owning or renting batteries - currently the only car manufacturer. Renault ended the scheme in 2021. Leie never took off very well in Norway. See more
 

 

The cars that go first in the press (Motor.no)

 

Automatic or manual transmission?

polo2010shiftIf you considered buying a new car with an automatic transmission ten years ago, you would have been told that you could never expect to get anything back from the automatic transmission surcharge when trading in. This has changed a lot. Demand for automatic transmission cars has increased - not least on the second-hand market.

There are the following 3 main types of automatic transmission. All automatically shift for you, but still behave quite differently:

  • Conventional automatic transmission (hydraulics with torque converter)
  • Continuously variable transmissions (CVT)
  • Robotic gear change

Conventional automatic transmission shifts when the engine revs rise. The transmission between engine and gear takes place via hydraulic oil and not directly connected as in a manual gearbox. The result is increased comfort because fewer movements propagate from gears and axles into the passenger compartment. The disadvantage is that the solution steals power from the engine on its way out to the wheels. This means that you have to count on higher fuel consumption compared to other solutions. CO2 emissions also increase - and with it the one-off tax and your purchase price. Conventional automatic transmission is an expensive solution in Norway.

Continuously variable transmissions (CVT) transmits the power between the engine and drive shafts via a metal belt that adjusts the ratio steplessly. This means that you don't get any jerks when changing gears and that the engine can be kept in its most optimal rev range at all times. There is almost no energy loss with this gear solution. It can be a little unusual to drive a car with a completely stepless gear change. Although the technology is admittedly different, the CVT solution works in principle in the same way as gearless scooters and chainsaws! Most CVT gearboxes have the option to shift manually. Pre-set, fixed ratios along the belt path are then selected.

Robotic gear change is the solution that has seen the most growth in recent years. The solution is based on the fact that there is a robot that clutches and changes gears for you based on electronic analysis of the engine, the car's inclination and the driver's use of the pedals etc. When the gear is engaged, the transmission between the engine and drive shafts works just like on a manual gearbox. The disadvantage of this solution is that the robot changes too slowly, but there have been major improvements here, e.g. with a so-called double clutch solution that can prepare the next gear change before you need it. The advantage is that the electronics can calculate optimal gear changes and thus reduce both fuel consumption and CO2 emissions compared to manual transmission.

Hill start, snow and queuing

Conventional automatic transmission holds the car so that it does not roll backwards at all when starting on a hill. An inexperienced driver need not fear that the car will roll backwards. Other automatic transmission solutions are combined with a "hillholder" function to ensure problem-free hill starts. The cars I've driven with robotic gear changes keep the car on the ground for about 3 seconds. This is enough time to move your right leg from the brake pedal to the gas pedal. "Hill holder" is supplied as standard/additional equipment on many cars today, so that this handy function is also available on manual cars.

You should be aware that some of the most primitive robotic gearshift solutions lack the ability to lock the gearbox to a single gear, which can cause problems when driving in extremely difficult conditions with ice and snow.

You are going up a steep hill full of snow. You drive with a primitive robotic gearbox. You accelerate so that the car shifts up into first, second... oops! … third! At the steepest point, the cash register must downshift to second gear. The time this takes means you lose speed and grip in the snow.

In traffic jams with frequent start-stops, automatic transmissions have major advantages over manual cars. Instead of "filing" the clutch, you hold the car with the brake. On manual cars, a lot of driving in traffic jams causes a lot of wear on the clutch. Please note that robotic transmission solutions use the clutch almost as much as if you had driven with a manual transmission. It is admittedly easier and more comfortable to drive in a queue, but the wear on the clutch is therefore almost the same. I say "almost" because such solutions often have many gears (7-8) and it also often includes one or two gears that are lower than the first gear on a manual gearbox. This allows the car to drive at extremely low speeds without wearing out the clutch.

My choice

My choice falls on a robotic gear change from one of the major car manufacturers. It offers the most advantages and provides the best driving pleasure. Some car manufacturers supply both robotic gear changes and CVT solutions (e.g. Audi and Toyota). Then I would choose a drive unit with a robotic solution rather than a CVT. I am convinced that it will hold its best in the future. Incidentally, there are only two reasons for me to choose a conventional automatic transmission solution. Either because I have chosen an extremely powerful motor at the absolute top of the price scale, or because I am looking for something very cheap, - at the very bottom of the price scale.

Here are some of the solutions today:

Make
System
Type
Audi
S tronic or Multitronic
Robotized (S tronic), CVT (Multitronic)
BMW
Conventional
Chevrolet (Korea)
Conventional
Citroën
EMG
Robotized
Ford (DE)
PowerShift or conventional
Robotized (Powershift)
Mazda
Conventional
Mitsubishi
INVECS-III
CVT
Nissan
xtronic
CVT
Opel
Conventional
Peugeot
EMG
Robotized
Renault
EDC
Robotized
Seat
DSG
Robotized
Skoda
DSG
Robotized
Toyota
MMT or Multidrive
Robotized (MMT), CVT (Multidrive)
Volkswagen
DSG
Robotized
Volvo
Geartronic or conventional
Robotized (Geartronic)

 

automatic-1-11